Abstract

Full paper prices: €32 / €24 / €60

Open Access price: €400

Symmetry: Culture and Science
Volume 32, Number 3, pages 405-420 (2021)
https://doi.org/10.26830/symmetry_2021_3_405

REVISITING FAÇADES: A NOTE ON SYMMETRY AS AN AESTHETIC PRINCIPLE

Almantas L. Samalavičius^*

^* Department of Architectural Fundamentals, Theory and Art, Vilnius Gediminas Technical University, Trakų st 1, Vilnius LT-01132, Lithuania.
E-mail: almantsam@yahoo.com
ORCID: 0000-0001-8753-407X

Abstract: The article deals with the shifting roles of façades in western architecture and different uses of symmetry. It has been argued that façades were given adequate expression during the Classical period; however, with the advent of the Modern era, façades lost their previous importance because of new ideologies and aesthetics favouring a free design of façades, resulting in adoption of large glass screens instead of traditional expressions of a building’s character by the use of symmetry, decorative details, rhythmic patterns, etc. Accordingly, contemporary cities lost some of their ‘facial’ qualities. Mechanistic attitudes toward city building and imperative demands to reconstruct the façade contributed to contemporary cities losing their character; in the meantime, monotony, mechanical repetition and blank surfaces often prevailed. Attempts to change attitudes towards the aesthetic qualities of modern façades, with the help of phenomenology as well as introduction of pattern language and other attitudes, did little to change the state of the art. Though there were critics and theorists who urged changing attitudes towards the somewhat tyrannical aesthetics of the Modern Movement, they had little effect on common architectural practice until lately when new, scientifically informed concepts began to emerge. The effects of views either ignoring the role of symmetry, or ignoring the need to escape the tyranny of its monotony, are herein discussed. It is suggested to reconsider the role of symmetry in façades of contemporary structures while rethinking the legacy of the 20th century’s architectural designs.

Keywords: façades, symmetry, built environment, architectural rhythm, aesthetics

References:
Berleant, A. (1992) The Aesthetics of Environment, Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 218 pp.

Ghomeishi, M. (2020) Aesthetic preferences of laypersons and its relationship with the conceptual properties on building façade design, Journal of Asian Architecture and Building Engineering, 20, 1, 12–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/13467581.2020.1782209

Gombrich, E. (1984) The Sense of Order: The Study of the Psychology of Decorative Art, Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 412 pp.

Hill, R. (1999) Designs and Their Consequences, New Haven: Yale University Press, 275 pp.

Johnson, M.L. (2015). “The Embodied Memory of Architecture”, In: Robinson, S. and Pallasmaa, J., eds. Mind in Architecture: Neuroscience, Embodiment, and the Future of Design, Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press.

Kalaga, W. (2010) Face/Façade: The Visual and the Ethical, Urbanistika ir architektūra, 34, 3, 120–127. https://doi.org/10.3846/tpa.2010.12

Katona, V. (2021) Relief Method: The analysis of architectonic façades by fractal geometry, Buildings, 11, 1, 16. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings11010016

Kellert, S.R., Heerwagen, J. and Mador M., eds. (2013) Biophilic Design: The Theory, Science and Practice of Bringing Buildings to Life, Hoboken: Wiley, 432 p.

Krier, L. (2009) Architecture of Community, Washington: Island Press, 460 pp.

Mallgrave, H.F. (2013) Architecture and Embodiment: The Implications of the New Sciences and Humanities for Design, New York: Routledge, 224 pp. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203071144

Mallgrave, H.F. (2017) ““Know thyself”: Or what designers can learn from the contemporary biological sciences”, In: Robinson, S. and Pallasmaa, J., eds. Mind in Architecture: Neuroscience, Embodiment and the Future of Design, Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press, 259 pp.

Meiss, P. (1998) Elements of Architecture: From Form to Place, New York: Spon Press, 211 pp.

Mehaffy, M.W., Salingaros, N.A. (2015) Design for a Living Planet, Portland: Sustasis Press, 236 pp.

Mehaffy M.W. (2020). A New Pattern Language for Growing Regions: Places, Networks, Processes, Portland: Sustasis Press, 363 pp.

Mumford, L. (1964) The Highway and the City, New York: Mentor, 256 pp.

Palladio, A. (1965) The Four Books on Architecture, [reprint of the 1738 ed.], transl. by I. Wate, New York: Dove.

Pallasmaa, J. (1996) The Eyes of the Skin: Architecture and the Senses, Chichester: Wiley, 130 pp.

Rassmussen, S.E. (1959) Experiencing Architecture, Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 251 pp.

Salingaros, N.A. (2020) Symmetry gives meaning to architecture, Symmetry: Culture and Science, 31, 3, 231–260. https://doi.org/10.26830/symmetry_2020_3_231

Scruton, R. (1979) Aesthetics of Architecture, Princeton: Princeton University Press, xxxiii + 289 pp.

Sussman A., Hollander, J.B. (2015) Cognitive Architecture: Designing for How We Respond to the Built Environment, New York: Routledge, 193 pp. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315856964

Vitruvius (1960) The Ten Book of Architecture, New York: Dover Publications, 331 pp.