| Previous abstract | Back to issue content | Next abstract |
Volume 37, Number 1, pages 049-087 (2026)
https://doi.org/10.26830/symmetry_2026_1_049
A MATHEMATICAL EXPOSITION OF BALANCE IN THE PERCEPTION OF AVIAN EGG SHAPE AND ITS RELATIONSHIP TO HUMAN NOTIONS OF “HARMONIC” STRUCTURES – FROM SYMMETRY TO ASYMMETRY
Valeriy G. Narushin1, Michael N. Romanov2,3,*, Darren K. Griffin2,3
1 Independent researcher, Zaporizhya 69035, Ukraine
Email: val@vitamarket.com.ua
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6799-6605
2 School of Natural Sciences, University of Kent, Canterbury, Kent CT2 7NJ, UK
Email: m.romanov@kent.ac.uk
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3584-4644
3 Animal Genomics and Bioresource Research Unit (AGB Research Unit), Faculty of Science, Kasetsart University, Chatuchak, Bangkok 10900, Thailand
Email: d.k.griffin@kent.ac.uk
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7595-3226
* Corresponding author
Abstract: Eggs are regarded to be harmonious and aesthetic structures, with their shape used in art, architecture, design and engineering applications. Considering that they combine many different shapes, from symmetrical (ellipsoid) to asymmetrical (though bilaterally symmetrical), we herein aimed to develop mathematical principles that allow us to formalize a definition of the degree of harmony in egg-shaped figures. Proposing a “principle of balance”, in which the basis of the most aesthetic shape demonstrated equality of volumes/projection areas in pointed and blunt ends, we developed computational dependences, with which one can select the parameters of eggs so that their shape meets these principles. We demonstrate that two famous artworks do not adhere to such principles but describe how it could, theoretically, be possible to alter the egg shapes in them so that their aesthetic perception may be reconsidered. We generated, by artificial intelligence, an egg shape defined on the condition that it most represents the most aesthetic shape to the human eye, finding that it fully complied with our balance principles. Since “harmony” is a subjective term and individual perceptions of it may vary, we consider the appropriateness of formalization in determining the degree of aesthetics of egg shape, while adhering to the general perception of a bird’s egg due to its asymmetric geometric structure. Aspects of our findings may have practical applications in agriculture, architecture, design and/or engineering.
Keywords: avian eggs, egg geometry, symmetry vs. asymmetry, egg images, egg profiles, egg shape balance, egg volume, egg normal projection, egg-inspired engineering
References:
Ali, J.M., Gobithaasan, R.U., and Majid, A.A. (2010). Natural aesthetic curves for design, In Fourth Saudi Science Conference “Contribution of Science Faculties in the Development Process of KSA”, Al-Madinah Al-Munawwarah, Saudi Arabia, March 21–24, 2010, Al-Madinah Al-Munawwarah, Saudi Arabia. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/263581621
Archiproducts (2025). Egg design: The design inspired by the egg, Bari, Italy: Archiproducts.com. https://www.archiproducts.com/en/focus/egg-design-the-design-inspired-by-the-egg_593638
Beavers, C.M., Zuo, T., Duchamp, J.C., Harich, K., Dorn, H.C., Olmstead, M.M., and Balch, A.L. (2006). Tb3N@C84: An improbable, egg-shaped endohedral fullerene that violates the isolated pentagon rule, Journal of the American Chemical Society, 128, 11352–11353. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja063636k
Birkhoff, G.D. (1933). Aesthetic Measure, Cambridge, MA, USA: Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.4159/harvard.9780674734470
Breitenbach, D. (2019). Eggs in art and design, Deutsche Welle. https://amp-dw-com.cdn.ampproject.org/v/s/amp.dw.com/en/beyond-chocolate-the-egg-in-art-and-design/a-47237578?amp_gsa=1&_js_v=a9
Brinkmann, A. (2009). Mathematical beauty and its characteristics – a study on the student's point of view, Mathematics Enthusiast, 6, 365–380. https://doi.org/10.54870/1551-3440.1158
ChatGPT (2025). San Francisco, CA, USA: OpenAI; https://chatgpt.com/.
Douchová, V. (2015). Birkhoff’s aesthetic measure, Acta Universitatis Carolinae. Philosophica et historica, 21, 39–53. https://doi.org/10.14712/24647055.2016.8
DSM (2025). What is the role of balance in graphic design?, Sandton, South Africa: Digital School of Marketing (DSM). https://digitalschoolofmarketing.co.za/graphic-design-blog/the-role-of-balance-in-graphic-design/
Eberhart, S. (2000). On growth and form in nature and art: the projective geometry of plant buds and Greek vases, In: Sarhangi, R., ed., Bridges: Mathematical Connections in Art, Music, and Science, 3rd Annual BRIDGES Conference Proceedings, Winfield, KS, USA, July 28–30, 2000, Winfield, KS, USA: Bridges Conference, 267–278; ISBN 0-9665201-2-2. https://archive.bridgesmathart.org/2000/bridges2000-267.pdf
Elephant (2019). An egg is for art, not just for Easter, The Index, Elephant.art, Elephant Media. https://elephant.art/egg-art-not-just-easter
Feleki, A., and Nagy, Z. (2016). Challenges in Structural Designing of Egg-shaped Steel Structure, In: Challenges in Design and Construction of an Innovative and Sustainable Built Environment, 19th IABSE Congress, Stockholm, Sweden, September 21–23, 2016, Stockholm, Sweden: IABSE Congress, 2243–2250.https://doi.org/10.2749/stockholm.2016.2242
Freiberger, M. (2007). Perfect buildings: the maths of modern architecture, Plus Magazine. https://plus.maths.org/content/perfect-buildings-maths-modern-architecture
Garbin, B., Fatome, J., Oppo, G.L., Erkintalo, M., Murdoch, S.G., and Coen, S. (2020). Asymmetric balance in symmetry breaking, Physical Review Research, 2, 023244. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.2.023244
Gilbert, C. (1974). “The egg reopened” again, Art Bulletin, 56, 252–258. https://doi.org/10.1080/00043079.1974.10790036
Gobithaasan, R.U., Ahmad, A., and Ali, J. (2008). Measuring the beauty of planar curves using modified Birkhoff’s formula, In: The Proceedings of Seminar Kebangsaan Aplikasi Sains dan Matematik (SKASM’08)., Batu Pahat, Malaysia, November 24–25, 2008, Batu Pahat, Malaysia, 1–7. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/263581577
Gobithaasan, R.U., Ali, J., and Miura, K.T. (2013). An improvised algorithm to identify the beauty of a planar curve, arXiv, arXiv:1304.7883v1 [cs.GR]. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1304.7883
Gobithaasan, R.U., Ali, J., and Wahab, A.F. (2009). Natural aesthetic curves, In: Simposium Kebangsaan Sains Matematik ke-17 (SKSM17)., Melaka, Malaysia, December 15–17, 2009, Melaka, Malaysia. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/263581410
Grady, K. (2023). Why are artists and designers so obsessed with eggs?, London, UK: House & Garden. https://www.houseandgarden.co.uk/article/interiors-egg-obsession
Hage, S. (2021). Eggs in art. Eggs as canvas; eggs as symbol, Sarah Hage https://sarahhage.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/Eggs1.pdf
Harada, T., and Yoshimoto, F. (2002). Production of 'drawing curves' using an ellipse for industrial design, Bulletin of Japanese Society for the Science of Design, 49, 9–16. https://doi.org/10.11247/jssdj.49.9_2
Harada, T., and Yoshimoto, F. (2003). Curves in natural and factory products, Bulletin of Japanese Society for the Science of Design, 50, 55–62.
Herz-Fischler, R. (1990). Dürer’s paradox or why an ellipse is not egg-shaped, Mathematics Magazine, 63, 75–85. https://doi.org/10.1080/0025570X.1990.11977491
Hodos, T. (2020). Eggstraordinary artefacts: decorated ostrich eggs in the ancient Mediterranean world, Humanities & Social Sciences Communications, 7, 45. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-020-00541-8
Hübner, R., and Fillinger, M.G. (2019). Perceptual balance, stability, and aesthetic appreciation: Their relations depend on the picture type, Iperception, 10, 2041669519856040. https://doi.org/10.1177/2041669519856040
Hübner, R., and Ufken, E.S. (2023). On the beauty of vases: Birkhoff’s aesthetic measure versus Hogarth’s line of beauty, Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1114793. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1114793
Hwang, K., and Park, C.Y. (2021). The divine proportion: Origins and usage in plastic surgery, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open, 9, e3419. https://doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000003419
Jackson, K. (2017). Symbolism in art: The egg, ArtDependence Magazine. https://www.artdependence.com/articles/symbolism-in-art-the-egg
Kimber, H. (1995). The ‘Golden Egg’, Teaching Statistics, 17, 34–37. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9639.1995.tb00860.x
Kitat, S.E.S. (2014). Ostrich egg and its symbolic meaning in the ancient Egyptian monastery churches, Journal of the General Union of Arab Archaeologists, 15, 23–41. https://doi.org/10.21608/JGUAA.2014.3088
Koenderink, J.J. (2026). Guest Editorial: The Beauty and the Beast. Perception, 55, 105–110. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/epub/10.1177/03010066251403884
Kumar, S., Suleski, M., Craig, J.M., Kasprowicz, A.E., Sanderford, M., Li, M., Stecher, G., and Hedges, S.B. (2022). TimeTree 5: An expanded resource for species divergence times, Molecular Biology and Evolution, 39, msac174. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msac174
Leeming, D.A. (2010). Creation Myths of the World: An Encyclopedia, 2nd ed., Santa Barbara, CA, USA: ABC-CLIO; ISBN 9781598841749. https://archive.org/details/creationmythsofw0002leem
Lidwell, W., Holden, K., and Butler, J. (2010). Universal Principles of Design: 125 Ways to Enhance Usability, Influence Perception, Increase Appeal, Make Better Design Decisions, and Teach through Design, Beverly, MA, USA: Rockport Publishers; ISBN 9781592535873. https://www.academia.edu/download/39579365/Universal_Principles_of_Design.pdf
Livio, M. (2002a). The Golden Ratio: The Story of Phi, the World's Most Astonishing Number, New York, NY, USA: Broadway Books. https://archive.org/details/the-golden-ratio-the-story-of-phi-the-worlds-most-astonishing-number
Livio, M. (2002b). The golden ratio and aesthetics, Plus Magazine. https://plus.maths.org/content/golden-ratio-and-aesthetics
Lynn, G. (2023). Unlocking the Ancient Secrets to Healing: Why Science is Looking to the Past for the Future of Medicine, Harmonic Egg Media; ISBN 9781734378306. https://books.google.com/books/about/Unlocking_the_Ancient_Secrets_to_Healing.html?id=w--ZzAEACAAJ
Manippa, V., and Tommasi, L. (2023). The shape of you: do individuals associate particular geometric shapes with identity?, Current Psychology, 42, 10042–10052. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-021-02297-z
Merrick, R. (2010). Harmonically guided evolution, Natural Philosophy Alliance Proceedings, 7, V.042010. http://www.interferencetheory.com/files/Harmonic_Evolution.pdf
mmERCH (2024). The art of eggs in design, art, & fashion, Minnie Muse. https://www.minniemuse.com/articles/the-art-of/eggs
Montgomerie, R., Hemmings, N., Thompson, J.E., and Birkhead, T.R. (2021). The shapes of birds’ eggs: evolutionary constraints and adaptations, American Naturalist, 198, E215–E231 https://doi.org/10.1086/716928
Narushin, V.G., Romanov, M.N., Lu, G., Cugley, J., and Griffin, D.K. (2020). Digital imaging assisted geometry of chicken eggs using Hügelschäffer’s model, Biosystems Engineering, 197, 45–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2020.06.008
Narushin, V.G., Romanov, M.N., Lu, G., Cugley, J., and Griffin, D.K. (2021a). How oviform is the chicken egg? New mathematical insight into the old oomorphological problem, Food Control, 119, 107484. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2020.107484
Narushin, V.G., Romanov, M.N., and Griffin, D.K. (2021b). Egg and math: introducing a universal formula for egg shape, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1505, 169–177. https://doi.org/10.1111/nyas.14680
Narushin, V.G., Griffin, A.W., Romanov, M.N., and Griffin, D.K. (2022a). Measurement of the neutral axis in avian eggshells reveals which species conform to the golden ratio, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1517, 143–153. https://doi.org/10.1111/nyas.14895
Narushin, V.G., Romanov, M.N., and Griffin, D.K. (2022b). Egg-inspired engineering in the design of thin-walled shelled vessels: a theoretical approach for shell strength, Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, 10, 995817. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2022.995817
Narushin, V.G., Romanov, M.N., Gressier, L., Jacob, E., Salamon, A., and Kent, J.P. (2023a). Predicting preincubation parameters in goose eggs to reduce their hatching waste, Biosystems Engineering, 236, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2023.10.006
Narushin, V.G., Orszulik, S.T., Romanov, M.N., and Griffin, D.K. (2023b). A novel approach to egg and math: Improved geometrical standardization of any avian egg profile, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1529, 61–71. https://doi.org/10.1111/nyas.15059
Narushin, V.G., Romanov, M.N., and Griffin, D.K. (2023c). A novel model for eggs like pears: How to quantify them geometrically with two parameters?, Journal of Biosciences, 48, 35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12038-023-00361-3
Narushin, V.G., Volkova, N.A., Vetokh, A.N., Dzhagaev, A.Yu., Sotnikov, D.A., Volkova, L.A., Orszulik, S.T., Griffin, D.K., Romanov, M.N., and Zinovieva N.A. (2024a). Reimagining Archimedes: an innovative and accurate calculation of volumes and asserting another standard method for defining the surface area of quail and any avian eggs, Food and Bioproducts Processing, 147, 327–334. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fbp.2024.07.013
Narushin, V.G., Romanov, M.N., Avni-Magen, N., and Griffin, D.K. (2024b). Accurate calculation of the content volume, density and original weight of museum curated eggs, Scientific Reports, 14, 31594. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-75397-y
Narushin, V.G., Romanov, M.N., and Griffin, D.K. (2024c). Pear-shaped eggs evolved to maximize the surface area-to-volume ratio, increase metabolism, and shorten incubation time in birds, Integrative Zoology, 20, 1098-1109. https://doi.org/10.1111/1749-4877.12936
Narushin, V.G., Romanov, M.N., Salamon, A., Kent, J.P., and Griffin, D.K. (2026a). Creating a simulated virtual collection of avian egg shapes, In: Khaliduzzaman, A., Ahad, M.A.R., Kamruzzaman, M., and Aboonajmi, M. eds., Handbook of Egg Sensing Technology, Boca Raton, FL, USA: CRC Press (in print).
Narushin, V.G., Romanov, M.N., Avni-Magen, N., and Griffin, D.K. (2026b). Avian egg incubation period: Revisiting existing allometric relationships, Journal of Zoology (submitted).
Obradović, M., and Martinenko, A. A. (2023). Method for Adjusting the Shape of Semioval Arches Using Hügelschäffer’s Construction, In: Bajšanski, I. and Jovanović, M., eds., Proceedings of the 9th International Scientific Conference on Geometry, Graphics and Design in the Digital Age “Mongeometrija 2023”, Novi Sad, Serbia, June 7–10, 2023, Faculty of Technical Sciences, University of Novi Sad, Serbian Society for Geometry and Graphics: Novi Sad, Serbia, 205-215. https://grafar.grf.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/3354
Omran, W. (2015). The Egg and its symbolism in the Graeco-Roman period, International Journal of Heritage, Tourism, and Hospitality, 9, 73–185. https://dev.emarefa.net/en/detail/BIM-859419-the-egg-and-its-symbolism-in-the-graeco-roman-period
Petrović, M., Obradović, M., and Mijailović, R. (2011). Suitability analysis of Hugelschaffer’s egg curve application in architectural and structures’ geometry, Buletinul Institutului Politehnic din Iași. Secția Construcții de Mașini, 57, 115–122. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/258113014
Piessens, R., Doncker-Kapenga, E. de, Überhuber, C.W., and Kahaner, D.K. (1983). QUADPACK: A Subroutine Package for Automatic Integration, Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-61786-7
Recraft (2025). Mastering balance in art: Tips & techniques, Recraft Blog, London, UK: Recraft, Inc. https://www.recraft.ai/blog/balance-in-art-tips
Romanoff, A.L., and Romanoff, A.J. (1949). The Avian Egg, New York, NY, USA: John Wiley & Sons Inc. https://archive.org/details/avianegg0000alex
Scala, M.R. (2022). The symbology of the egg through the arts: from the myth of creation to Easter, Turin, Italy: Hypercritic, Rampart. https://hypercritic.org/the-symbology-of-the-egg-through-the-arts-from-the-myth-of-creation-to-easter
Sharma, N. (2017). A study on symmetrical and asymmetrical design in media communication, International Journal of Innovative Research in Science, Engineering and Technology, 6, 13409–134155. https://doi.org/10.15680/IJIRSET.2017.0607177
Shi, P., Wang, L., Quinn, B.K., and Gielis, J. (2023). A new program to estimate the parameters of Preston’s equation, a general formula for describing the egg shape of birds, Symmetry, 15, 231. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym15010231
Shkolna, O.V., Sosik, O.D., Hurenko, M.O., Diachenko, R.V., and Zaitseva, V.I. (2023). Painted eggs in the Muslim and Christian traditions, Journal of European Studies, 53, 356–370. https://doi.org/10.1177/00472441231205728
Song, J., and Kim, C.-Y. (2025). Type of art expertise matters: Practical experts show a greater curvature preference for three-dimensional shapes than theoretical experts, Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000746
Songsheng, Y.Y., and Wang, J.M. (2023). Differential interferometric signatures of close binaries of supermassive black holes in active galactic nuclei: II. Merged broad line regions, arXiv, arXiv:2302.08338v1 [astro-ph.GA]. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2302.08338
Stakhov, A. (2014). The mathematics of harmony. Proclus’ hypothesis and new view on Euclid’s elements and history of mathematics starting since Euclid, Applied Mathematics, 5, 3335–3352. https://doi.org/10.4236/am.2014.521311
Stoddard, M.C., Yong, E.H., Akkaynak, D., Sheard, C., Tobias, J.A., and Mahadevan, L. (2017). Avian egg shape: form, function, and evolution, Science, 356, 1249–1254. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaj1945
Stoddard, M.C., Sheard, C., Akkaynak, D., Yong, E.H., Mahadevan, L., and Tobias, J.A. (2019). Evolution of avian egg shape: underlying mechanisms and the importance of taxonomic scale, Ibis, 161, 922–925. https://doi.org/10.1111/ibi.12755
Subedi, S. (2024). The Golden Ratio: a mathematical and aesthetic marvel, Damak Campus Journal, 13, 54–64. https://doi.org/10.3126/dcj.v13i1.74537
Tlemissov, A., and Kovář, J. (2024). Egg-shaped sections of fluid structures around black holes, European Physical Journal C, 84, 1115. https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-024-13496-w
Trautmann, L. (2021). Emotions evoked by geometric patterns, J, 4, 376–393. https://doi.org/10.3390/j4030029
Van Geert, E., Bossens, C., and Wagemans, J. (2023). The Order & Complexity Toolbox for Aesthetics (OCTA): A systematic approach to study the relations between order, complexity, and aesthetic appreciation. Behavior Research Methods, 55, 2423–2446. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-022-01900-w
Wang, H., Fu, T., Du, Y., Gao, W., Huang, K., Liu, Z., Chandak, P., Liu, S., Van Katwyk, P., Deac, A., et al. (2023). Scientific discovery in the age of artificial intelligence, Nature, 620, 47–60. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-023-06221-2
White, A.W. (2011). The Elements of Graphic Design, 2nd ed., New York, NY, USA: Allworth Press; ISBN 9781581157628. https://www.google.com/books/edition/The_Elements_of_Graphic_Design/zQNrCgAAQBAJ
Wikimedia Commons (2012a). Northern shoveler Anas clypeata, egg, Coll. Museum Wiesbaden, Origin: Ismaning, Bavaria, 18.05.1973, leg. W. Abelmann, by Klaus Rassinger und Gerhard Cammerer, CC-BY-SA-3.0. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Anas_clypeata_MWNH_1990.JPG
Wikimedia Commons (2012b). Tataupa tinamou Crypturellus tataupa, egg, Coll. Museum Wiesbaden, by Klaus Rassinger und Gerhard Cammerer, CC-BY-SA-3.0. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Crypturellus_tataupa_MWNH_0078.JPG
Wikimedia Commons (2012c). Pygmy cormorant Phalacrocorax pygmeus, egg, Coll. Museum Wiesbaden, by Klaus Rassinger und Gerhard Cammerer, CC-BY-SA-3.0. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Phalacrocorax_pygmeus_MWNH_0533.JPG
Wikimedia Commons (2013). Català: casa museo, Exterior of the Casa-Museu Salvador Dalí, by Alberto-g-rovi, CC-BY-SA-3.0. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Salvador_dali_-cadaques-2009_%2812%29.JPG
Wikimedia Commons (2014). Category: Eggs of the Natural History Collections of the Museum Wiesbaden. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Eggs_of_the_Natural_History_Collections_of_the_Museum_Wiesbaden
Wikimedia Commons (2018a). Egg of taiga bean goose, Collection of Jacques Perrin de Brichambaut, Muséum de Toulouse, by Ercé, CC-BY-SA-4.0. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Anser_fabalis_MHNT.ZOO.2010.11.14.7.jpg
Wikimedia Commons (2018b). La Vergine con il Bambino e santi, Pala di Brera by Piero della Francesca, by Alonso de Mendoza, CC-PD-Mark. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Piero_della_Francesca_046.jpg
Wikimedia Commons (2019). Category: Bird eggs of the Muséum de Toulouse. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Bird_eggs_of_the_Mus%C3%A9um_de_Toulouse
| Previous abstract | Back to issue content | Next abstract |